Where will Michigan's electoral votes go in the 2008 election? Many Democrats will say that they will go to the Democrat. I believe that we can't say for sure that that will happen.
Michigan is currently in an economic depression. Many people are out of work while the state budget is soaring They have dealt with government shutdowns and MAJOR budget shortfalls. Oh, and this has all been under a Democratic Governor and Legislature!
Apparently the socialist programs of Governor Granholm have bankrupted the state. The citizens of Michigan are aware of what policies have created there crappy situation and they are ready for a change! Because of this, do you think they would again vote for a Democrat who is making the same campaign promises of their failed Governor?
The DNC should look no further than the great state of Michigan to see why there policies never succeed. As Rush said, we owe the great citizens of Michigan a great debt because they are showing the rest of the world why the Democrats are wrong!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Looks like Michigan voters like their socialists!
Democratic Granholm
(Incumbent)
2,139,839 56%
Republican DeVos
1,606,058 42%
Mitt will probably get Michigan, but too little too late if Iowa and N.H. don't go his way.
Anyway, the importance of Iowa is a joke. Check out my Top Ten List for why the Iowa Caucus sucks!
http://vacollegerepublicans.blogspot.com/2008/01/top-ten-list-why-iowa-caucus-sucks.html
After outspending Huckabee by an outrageous margin, your man Mitt found that the voters of Iowa, in the end, could not be bought. Nor could they be fooled by a man who oozes insincerity from every pore.
After all the wasted money, and after all the weeks of relentless Huckabee bashing by people like you, your man doesn’t simply get beaten, he gets hammered, crushed. It was like a fight between the schoolyard bully and a 98 pound weakling that ends with the bully suffering a hellacious beat down. Of course the flaw in that analogy is that it is really Romney who is the weakling—a moral weakling, that is. After 7 years of Bush, Americans are used to being lied to and taken for fools. But it seems that they can’t stomach smarmy insincerity; given that this is the stock in trade of the Romney candidacy, therein lies the problem for the plastic man from Massachusetts.
You Romney folks are right about at least one thing, however. Huckabee is indeed a flawed candidate; if nominated it’s hard for me to believe that he has a chance in hell of winning the general election. Most Americans are far too open minded for the over-the-top super-Christianity that seemed to play well with the self-styled moralists in Iowa. But in your frantic search for Huckabee’s flaws as a candidate, the thing that you folks continue to ignore is Romney’s obvious flaws as a human. The ethical and moral lapses, combined with his peculiar penchant for just plain lying, all the while portraying himself as the wholesome candidate of truth, justice and the American way…well in the end even the Republicans who continue to deny themselves the truth about the Bush Administration could not be fooled by Mitt.
So now it’s on to New Hampshire where Mitt is already backpedaling furiously in an attempt to lower expectations. What’s clear, however, is that if the people of New Hampshire see Romney as clearly as Iowans did, all your frantic attempts to discredit Huckabee and McCain will be fruitless. It’s about Mitt now; people don’t trust him, they don’t believe him, they don’t like him. No amount of Huckabee and McCain bashing by the frantic legions of Romney supporters will obscure these simple facts…Mitt’s moral and ethical dwarfism will, in the end, doom him. Evidence, it seems, that primary voters are not as stupid as you and Mitt take them for. The system works!
Have a nice day
Phil
http://youtube.com/watch?v=43TVmSoaQ7c&feature=dir
Post a Comment